Mother of hero but hero

First of all for whoever are reading this paper, please don't take this offensive. It's just the way i understanding this as a 18 year old, it might change over time but this is what i think about this right now.

"The Pentagon announced that all positions in the military would be open women" As far as i know, the trend of the world about man and women is trying to be equal, but from the characteristics of women,I think woman really is not that suitable for battlefield, we should let women walk away from wars, a woman can become the mother of a hero, but not the hero on the field.

First, from what i know and the most common sense about war is that you'll have to physically fight it, so what that tells me is it requires not only mentally strong but physically strong. It's not me saying that women are weak physically, it's just women and men are in many aspects of physical difference. Just like i believe that in all the competitive sports, there is a reason why men and women are separated. Even in sports they separate them,  So not even has to mention in WARS. 

Second, the war to endure things that are cruel and no one would believe in tears. You can get wounded real easy, Arms and legs would be "flying around". When it's happened, it will be painful on the outside body and might also leaves a scare mentally forever inside. And for women, i think the only "memorable pain" for them is when they bring the new life to this world.

Again, once women are on the battlefield front line, they are oftenlly not be seen as rivals and soldiers, but as the spoils of war, as the victim for their violence. 

Finally, a lot of history does appear "strange" woman, joined the arm and became the elites, and be famous everwhere, like Chinese Mulan, MU, Western Joan of Arc, the Soviet Union Zoya and Shura ...... but this are all pretty much the outcome of “Propaganda” to show people that how equal this world is and how women can do the same as man in the war. For this topic, im not completely against, i think women should have the right to go into the war to help, but just not the very front line. And not HAVE to, but WANT to. 

GUN GUN GUN

"Why does that matter to law-abiding gun owners? Because they’re the ones who anti-gun politicians and the media blame when criminals misuse guns. We need to bring back and expand programs like Project Exile and get gang members and drug dealers off the street. When we do, crime will go down and our cities and communities will be safer places to live." Find from Trump's page, I like how he went to the base reason of why do those people want to own guns. Not only because of the self-control and self defense. But them self want to have guns. So when the issue comes out, they'll have no right to yell out about how it's the gun control's fault. 

“Our personal protection is ultimately up to us. That’s why I’m a gun owner, that’s why I have a concealed carry permit, and that’s why tens of millions of Americans have concealed carry permits as well." Comes to the end, it's still the thing that people tried to do for them self, but only when it's benefit you. The "concealed carry permit" is not just for you to say you can have a gun and just shot around or kill. It's only for the defense of yourself, when you get the permit, you should've already known about this. It's only good when it's good for you, So if you've said yes to this, don't now come back and complain about it.

OSTU

    After watching Obamas's State of the Union speech, he talked about what the nation have done during his presidency, i felt like he blamed all those "fails" onto the republican party, on his own said he showed all the chart and numbers to prove what he said and he was sounding proud when he said all that, those charts do look pleasure but mostly he did talked about was how the country had well grown from the time he was elected. I didn't heard he talked about those "country problems" a lot such as ISIS. I don't think he did a great job on those part. That's probably why he did not talk about it much. 

Turn Left Left Right

Clearly most of people are going with the left, but in the left side, I don’t see much decision had been made perfect peacefully, why? Because people get to say whatever they want to say and whatever they believes. And if there’s sunlight there must shadow behind it, so there always will be people that are against you. So there will be arguments, I’m not saying that arguments are bad, I actually think it’s a good thing. Because i think that argument makes improvement. We need to be improving but keep stepping on the same spot. However, some of the arguments that are going on are not the ones i’m thinking of. I was more looking forwards to those argument with reasonable reasons and basis, not the ones that with no respect and not even listening to the others ones, just believe in whatever they are thinking and even the they can’t tell why they are believing in it, that’s just feels like nonsense to me.   

“liberty and equality”, two keystones to the left side, this are the reason why I’m for the left side, because personally i think that some of the traditional stuff can be changed. People should have their own rights and say stuff, But in the bigger picture, I’m not against the right side, I believe in that there can’t be no changes, but also can not be all changed.

        My thought China Using Prisoners’ Organs for Transplants. Since they are using those prisoner's organs (death penalty's) to save other people's live after the penalty. I think it's not a bad thing for them because of they can actually do something helpful to repay their sin. But doing this without their agreement is just wrong. Some people think that they wont have a complete body in their next life if they do that. So they should not do it even they have a death penalty. They still have the right to chose. But still, If they you can save another life with your dead life, why not?

Attaque de Paris

        Once we've got a idea of "we can believe in whatever" "whatever we believe is right". Well, no matter what we believe, there is a standard for things, and the standard is not what we believe. It's humanity. It's what make human human. It is what make us unique. We can think uniquely more than just doing indistinctly. But it doesnt mean you can do whatever you want to just because of you believe it. Human are social animals. We live as a group. There we have the rule of majority. We listen to the majority. We do what majority agree with. When the majority are following humanity but not believes, we should go with humanity. But lately there was a group of people, ISIS, are trying to overthrow the  rule of majority by violently making everyone believe in what they are believing. Honestly what my thought about it is that's just rude from every view, First, it's just not right to kill people... second, more than killing is that they are trying to delete one of our human ability. We can believe in whatever we want is because of that we can think uniquely. If they try to force people to think the same to believe the same. They are just wipe of a part of humanity. I don't think that's a good idea. 

The choice is yours.

   Years ago, those who got deadly disease, such as late period cancer. Th y will just die in like one or two month. But now with our current technology and medical equipment, we can keep them alive for one or couple more years, but they are still gonna die. Well, everyone is dying, even at these very moment, we are dying. However, there is a different between pure dying and “SUFFERING”. When we put all the medical equipment stuff on the patients, they might can be able to live for like a couple more month or years, but they might not going to be able to talk, walk, or remember any stuff. Even though they nearly lost their instincts can still feel the PAIN. What happens when their body felt the pain? They might yell, might cry, might twitch, might... When it comes to this point, they already lost their life ability, lost their memory and lost their Dignity. In a very cruel way to look at them, they are just “living zombies”, the only thing that can keep them being “zombies”, is death. What if those “who” were your parents, your relatives or someone thats really close to you, would you just watch them suffering the pain days and days years and years? For me, I won’t, I can never watching my parents or my relatives just suffering in bed days over days and lying to them “you will get better soon” when knowing that they will be dead for sure. 

   When we talked about during my civics class, one of my classmate pulled out a interesting thought about this topic, “As a Christian, I know if i agreed with my parents just to do Euthanasia and end their suffering here. They will end up going to hell and suffer for eternity. I will never let that happen.”Even though I am not a Christian, I’m still agreeing with her thought, because everyone has their right to believe in the stuff that they believes because of that no one knows the truth about what happens when people dies expect those who already dead. If I know death through euthanasia will leading my parents to hell and suffering forever, i won’t let them either. But for my personal opinion, God is the outcome of human’s loneliness, because after someone does something wrong or afraid of some thing thats going to happen, they want to have a reliable person to stay with them, to help them and share their loneliness, but human can never trust another man completely because we are humans thats how it is. You ever had something that happened to you or something you have done that you can’t even tell your “Best Friend”,your “Boy/girl friend or even your wife/husband”? Well, Yes you might can say that “I can 100% trust my parents”, i will give you that but you have to realize that there will be one day they will leave you eventually, who are you gonna trust when that time comes? Everyone has their own God, I do too, i think he helps me, i pray to him all the time wish that he can help me with everything. But maybe because i did not grow up under a christian environment so i have never read a bible or had someone preached to me about God about Christian to me, or maybe i would be a christian right now. (no offense to anyone, just personal opinion)

   Back to the Euthanasia problem. Jerry Brown, who had cancer himself, allowed the assisted suicide in California.and before he allowed this,He said that before making this decision he considered both moral and religious arguments. I think this is not a deadly wrong thing because of that it is not against any religions, its “allowed” not “forced”. It’s just gave a opportunity to those extreme cases that i was talking about earlier. From my own believe, I do agree with this.